← back to flags
Audit trail
Reasoning trace
Flag explanation
The project clause states Panel EP-3 is located in Electrical Room 118, implying it is situated in a separate, dedicated electrical room. The local amendment prohibits panels from being located in a separate room, creating a potential conflict if Room 118 is a dedicated electrical room solely for housing panels.
Prompt sent to model
Project clause '1.1':
1.1 Panel EP-3 in Electrical Room 118 requires a 36 inch clear working space per NEC in front of the panel, mounted on the north wall.
Candidate jurisdiction code clauses (local amendments - only these may be cited):
[id: 34bcc862-3380-4533-a201-e83bf630d987] 3: 3. A six foot (1829 mm) clear working space shall be provided in front of all panels.
[id: fca99166-362b-472d-acb9-04bab145d7e3] 2: 2. Panels shall not be located in a separate room.
[id: ee312677-be70-48d7-8c59-392bc8c6bbf6] 1204.2.2: 1204.2.2 Adjoining spaces.
For the purpose of natural lighting, any room is permitted to be considered as a portion of an adjoining room
one-half of the area of the common wall is open and unobstructed and provides an opening of not less than 10
floor area of the interior room or 25 square feet (2.32 m2), whichever is greater. The net glazed area of exteri
[id: 393cb432-34db-4166-9110-2b395f096341] 1031.2: 1031.2 Fire department access panels.
Where the exterior wall on any story of a Group E-1 occupancy exceeds 100 linear feet (30.5 m) without windows, d
similar openings, fire department access panels shall be provided at intervals not exceeding 50 feet (15.2 m).
Exception: Exterior walls of auditoriums, assembly halls, field houses, gymnasiums, swimming pools, and t
[id: 2ce77581-41ff-4233-b119-54420ca5a1e0] 10: 10. Add a new Section 1006.2.2.7 to read:
"1006.2.2.7 Electrical rooms.
Two exit access doorways are required in electrical rooms containing equipment rated 3,000 amperes or greater. Exit
doorways shall be separated by a horizontal distance equal to not less than one-half the length of the maximum overa
dimension of the room."
These candidates are local amendments to the national model building code (e.g. IBC), not the full code. You may draw on your own general knowledge of standard model-code provisions to judge whether the project clause is consistent with normal practice, but any conflict you report must be grounded in - and cite - one of the local amendment clauses shown above, since those are the only things a human reviewer can independently verify against this jurisdiction's actual adopted text.
Does the project clause conflict with or fail to meet any of these code requirements? Call report_conflicts with your findings, or an empty conflicts list if there's no real conflict.
Raw model response
{"conflicts": [{"severity": "high", "explanation": "The project clause specifies only 36 inches of clear working space in front of Panel EP-3, but the jurisdiction's local amendment requires a six foot (1829 mm) clear working space in front of all panels, regardless of the NEC's typically smaller minimum. This is a direct conflict since 36 inches is less than the required 72 inches.", "cited_jurisdiction_clause_ids": ["34bcc862-3380-4533-a201-e83bf630d987"]}, {"severity": "medium", "explanation": "The project clause states Panel EP-3 is located in Electrical Room 118, implying it is situated in a separate, dedicated electrical room. The local amendment prohibits panels from being located in a separate room, creating a potential conflict if Room 118 is a dedicated electrical room solely for housing panels.", "cited_jurisdiction_clause_ids": ["fca99166-362b-472d-acb9-04bab145d7e3"]}]}