Both clauses describe the mounting of a panel in an electrical closet, but they specify different heights above the finished floor, which could indicate a coordination conflict.
Clause '2.1' (low_voltage): 2.1 Access control head-end panel is mounted in the security closet at 5 feet 6 inches above finished floor. Candidate clauses from other disciplines in the same submission (only these may be cited): [id: 1e846493-c72d-463a-ab51-3490c8882962] electrical 2.1: 2.1 Panel EP-9 in Data Hall 1 electrical closet is wall-mounted at 5 feet 0 inches above finished floor. [id: f4079e9b-22ff-44aa-a213-bafb4cfc774f] mechanical 2.1: 2.1 Exhaust louver EL-3 penetrates the Data Hall 4 exterior wall at 7 feet 6 inches above finished floor. [id: 52bacc13-650c-4763-99da-463cb2017e75] architectural 2.1: 2.1 Acoustic ceiling tile grid in the office corridor is set at 9 feet 0 inches above finished floor, non-structural. [id: b88a0614-b3f5-45b1-ab48-78fc7d2547c1] electrical 1.1: 1.1 Switchgear SG-2 in Electrical Room 210 requires a dedicated 42 inch deep working clearance, free of any other trade's infrastructure, per NEC 110.26. [id: 57d266d8-7540-4012-a959-7ebd1ec2a38c] structural 1.2: 1.2 Structural beam B-19 provides a minimum clear height of 15 feet 0 inches above finished floor within Data Hall 3. Does this clause create a coordination conflict with any of the candidates above - i.e. do they describe the same physical space, element, or system in a way that is physically or functionally incompatible? Call report_cross_discipline_conflicts with your findings, or an empty conflicts list if there's no real conflict.
{"conflicts": [{"cited_clause_ids": ["1e846493-c72d-463a-ab51-3490c8882962"], "explanation": "Both clauses describe the mounting of a panel in an electrical closet, but they specify different heights above the finished floor, which could indicate a coordination conflict.", "severity": "low"}]}