Plan Review Copilot
← back to flags
Audit trail

Reasoning trace

Clause: 113
Severity: medium
Engine: real / claude-sonnet-5
Tokens: 1710 in / 190 out
Latency: 2852 ms
Called: 2026-08-09 07:01:09

Flag explanation

Architectural clause dimensions column at Grid C/3 as 47'-6" from Grid 1 based on field verification, while structural clause states the same column is located on grid at 48'-0" from Grid 1. This 6" discrepancy must be reconciled before partitions or casework are set relative to this column.

Prompt sent to model

Clause '113' (architectural):
113
COL
DIM'D @ 47'-6" FROMIGRID 1 (FIELD VERIFY)

Candidate clauses from other disciplines in the same submission (only these may be cited):
[id: 947c21fa-7f9c-496f-ac30-271f27246407] structural 1: 1. All new and existing columns are located strictly on the structural grid unless individually dimensioned otherwise. The column at Grid C/3, adjacent to the Sterilization/Storage partition, is located on grid at 48'-0" from Grid 1. The architectural floor plan (A-101)
dimensions this same column at 47'-6" from Grid 1 based on field conditions observed during their site walkthrough. Reconcile this 6" discrepancy with the architect before partitions or casework are set relative to this column.

[id: 7f90f154-e493-43c1-a813-58091925da17] structural 3: 3. Beam BM-4 (Grid B, bay 2-3): W10X22, 24'-0" long, bottom of steel +9'-0" AFF -- note that the framing plan callout for BM-4 elsewhere on this sheet reads W12X26; field-verify and confirm the correct size with this office before fabrication, as the two callouts for the same
mark do not agree.

[id: fd258c05-ae45-486c-b520-aaadb73a7a29] plumbing 2: 2. Coordinate WH-1's location with the electrical engineer's Panel EP-2, shown on E-101 on the same wall -- EP-2 requires 36" of dedicated clear working space, and WH-1 as located reduces the usable clear floor space in front of that panel to approximately 18".

[id: 735edb48-f4f8-4aa5-904b-e254003e73aa] plumbing 3: 3. The T&P relief valve discharge is piped full-size to within 6" of the floor per the water heater manufacturer's instructions, and directed to the floor drain in Mech/Elec Room 105.

[id: 13a1f856-3c1a-4ac4-b070-57a7ba9d4f7f] structural 5: 5. Beam BM-8 (Grid C, bay 1-2): W12X26, 24'-0" long, bottom of steel +9'-0" AFF.

Does this clause create a coordination conflict with any of the candidates above - i.e. do they describe the same physical space, element, or system in a way that is physically or functionally incompatible? Call report_cross_discipline_conflicts with your findings, or an empty conflicts list if there's no real conflict.

Raw model response

{"conflicts": [{"severity": "medium", "explanation": "Architectural clause dimensions column at Grid C/3 as 47'-6\" from Grid 1 based on field verification, while structural clause states the same column is located on grid at 48'-0\" from Grid 1. This 6\" discrepancy must be reconciled before partitions or casework are set relative to this column.", "cited_clause_ids": ["947c21fa-7f9c-496f-ac30-271f27246407"]}]}