Door D-15 swings outward into the corridor, which may conflict with the required 36 inch clear working space for Panel EP-6 in Electrical Room 121.
Clause '1.2' (architectural): 1.2 Door D-15 swings outward into the corridor, away from Electrical Room 121. Candidate clauses from other disciplines in the same submission (only these may be cited): [id: 81c2bca1-6531-44ce-a8a7-91d776c5527c] electrical 1.2: 1.2 Panel EP-6 in Electrical Room 121 requires a 36 inch clear working space per NEC in front of the panel, mounted on the south wall. [id: 3c277c45-28b0-4b89-a46f-45a3b21cb96c] electrical 1.1: 1.1 Panel EP-3 in Electrical Room 118 requires a 36 inch clear working space per NEC in front of the panel, mounted on the north wall. [id: 3d7a16c7-f33d-4cf7-9289-3a98972fec63] mechanical 1.1: 1.1 Ductwork DS-2 within Corridor 104 shall maintain a minimum clearance of 9 feet 6 inches above finished floor to the bottom of duct insulation. [id: b87d8892-c9b4-4675-bc7e-da83a0e78a55] mechanical 1.2: 1.2 Ductwork DS-4 within Corridor 109 shall maintain a minimum clearance of 8 feet 6 inches above finished floor to the bottom of duct insulation. [id: 42249cff-18ae-4182-9bc0-7eb5c43a096f] structural 1.1: 1.1 Structural beam B-4 provides a minimum clear height of 9 feet 0 inches above finished floor within Corridor 104. Does this clause create a coordination conflict with any of the candidates above - i.e. do they describe the same physical space, element, or system in a way that is physically or functionally incompatible? Call report_cross_discipline_conflicts with your findings, or an empty conflicts list if there's no real conflict.
{"conflicts": [{"cited_clause_ids": ["81c2bca1-6531-44ce-a8a7-91d776c5527c"], "explanation": "Door D-15 swings outward into the corridor, which may conflict with the required 36 inch clear working space for Panel EP-6 in Electrical Room 121.", "severity": "medium"}]}