Plan Review Copilot
← back to Demo: Cross-Discipline Clash Set
Flags

Current flags — Demo: Cross-Discipline Clash Set

Every clause is only ever reasoned about once per check type - a flag found under an earlier revision stays current here until the clause it's about is itself superseded by a later revision, not until the whole project is re-checked.

5 flag(s) found · view audit report → · view metrics →

All (8) vs. code (3) Cross-discipline (5)
TypeSeverityClauseFound inExplanationCitedModelStatus
cross-discipline high 1.1 Rev A The structural beam B-4 in Corridor 104 provides a minimum clear height of 9 feet 0 inches, but the ductwork DS-2 in the same corridor requires a minimum clearance of 9 feet 6 inches, which is physically incompatible.
mechanical 1.1
llama-3.3-70b-versatile
open
view reasoning
cross-discipline high 1.1 Rev A The mechanical clause requires a minimum clearance of 9 feet 6 inches, while the structural clause provides a minimum clear height of 9 feet 0 inches within the same corridor, Corridor 104, creating a physically incompatible condition.
structural 1.1
llama-3.3-70b-versatile
open
view reasoning
cross-discipline high 1.1 Rev A The 36 inch swing radius of Door D-12 centered 6 inches off the north wall in Electrical Room 118 is physically incompatible with the required 36 inch clear working space in front of Panel EP-3, also mounted on the north wall in the same room.
electrical 1.1
llama-3.3-70b-versatile
open
view reasoning
cross-discipline medium 1.1 Rev A The required 36 inch clear working space per NEC in front of Panel EP-3 in Electrical Room 118 interferes with the 36 inch swing radius of Door D-12, which swings into the same room and is centered 6 inches off the north wall where the panel is mounted.
architectural 1.1
llama-3.3-70b-versatile
open
view reasoning
cross-discipline medium 1.2 Rev A Door D-15 swings outward into the corridor, which may conflict with the required 36 inch clear working space for Panel EP-6 in Electrical Room 121.
electrical 1.2
llama-3.3-70b-versatile
open
view reasoning